Cons With each new release of Waterfox, the performance for me goes downhill, even on fresh installs with a fresh operating system. Similar to Firefox Since there is only an early 64-bit version not a stable version of the browser from Mozilla, you can use W as an alternative. I'm not noticing anything like that with Waterfox. Waterfox is certainly fast, but to really tell how fast, you'd need to run it side by side with another browser through various test sites. This stuff comes from the download site and is not the fault of the program you are trying to download. Waterfox also has regular updates.
I know cnet love anything Mozilla but they should step up on this clone and rate it as junk! I am heavy user of computer and run softwares simultanously and everything going smooth. Cons Why is it that now, after some 6 months of running Waterfox, it insisting on freezing so often? The browser is based on the source code of Firefox and according to the developer, its version is explicitly designed for performance, ie speed. Benchmarks were once available on the developers' website but have since been removed. A future version of Pale Moon on this code, but right now the developer considers Basilisk an unstable development platform. Cons Not sure that it runs better than Firefox. We could tell with just a few quick trips to familiar sites that Waterfox is fast, so we visited some of our favorite browser speed test sites to see how it stacks up against the competition, including Firefox and our current default, Chrome. The Start button for Waterfox is a deep blue color instead of the fiery orange color found in Firefox, but beyond that, the software is essentially identical in form and function.
This site is not directly affiliated with. How well the performance is noticeable depends on the different systems on which the software is used. There are official releases for including a portable version , , and. This allows you to adapt more easily to all the features that the browser brings to you. If you want to keep using your old add-ons that no longer work in Firefox Quantum, we recommend instead. Summary The tabs automatically restored my crashed Firefox session.
I'm wondering, from a netsec perspective, is there a difference? Cons Don't know any because computer performance is my top prority even I have to sacrifice one or two junk plugins which promise they work but who knows. Waterfox is continuing to support the long-standing and add-on capability that Firefox removed in version 57. The Mac build was introduced on May 14, 2015, with the release of version 38. As the Waterfox Web site states, speed is its mission. In order to use the open source version, Visual C ++ 2010 must be installed on the computer.
Waterfox has a family resemblance to other Mozilla-based browsers, with a dark blue Start button instead of Firefox's orange. When it comes to looks and extras, Waterfox doesn't disappoint in a side-by-side comparison with the latest Firefox release. Everything is the same as Firefox but Waterfox actually uses the 64 bit capabilities of most processors today. To make Waterfox stand out a bit more, it's compiled with optimizations so that it will run more efficiently and faster than just compiling Firefox as a 64-Bit program. It disables Pocket by default, but you can. Chrome held a consistent edge, but Waterfox is fast, too. Probably twice or three times a day the browser becomes unresponsive - usually once I open more than 5-6 tabs.
On February 1, 2018, was released with these patches. Installation copies Firefox preferences and extensions so this looks and feels exactly like the version of Firefox you are currently running. This is because the code for Waterfox is based off a stripped down version of Firefox that has been optimized for speed in 64-bit systems, which are starting to become the industry standard. Now, the developer is doing the same thing again, basing this new version largely on the pre-Quantum Firefox code. But it's still a while away from producing a stable build for the reasons mentioned above. I have a good pc, brand new, almost empty, lots of memory and ram, and on 32 bit firefox the browser was slow, i have skype running all the time, 2 games, and normally at least 5 or 6 browser windows, ventrilo and music playing. This latest version, however, has problems which don't go away.
Disclaimer Waterfox is a product developed by. Extensions If you enjoy install extensions that facilitate your day to day, this browser also allows them to be applied to it. Made specifically for 64-Bit systems, Waterfox has one thing in mind: speed. You can even customize the two browsers in the same ways. My go-to browser had been Opera but there were some performance issues on certain web sites. This is a gift from me. Waterfox tends to outperform Firefox, and it is generally in the same performance category as Google Chrome.
That boost alone should give the software an advantage when it comes to processing data collected from the web. It could be that the software simply feels faster because of the way it renders visuals in the 64-bit system. The Firefox source code is taken and compiled to run specifically for 64-Bit Windows computers. Summary Do not install this clone is one of the poorest I have seen! Firefox later implemented a more advanced cookie control feature as part of its tracking protection initiative. It should be faster than the 32-bit version of the Mozilla Firefox and respond faster to input. As of November 15, 2016, Waterfox had over 6 million downloads.